• Entrar
    Ver item 
    •   Página inicial
    • Graduação
    • Direito
    • Trabalhos de Conclusão de Curso (TCC)
    • Ver item
    •   Página inicial
    • Graduação
    • Direito
    • Trabalhos de Conclusão de Curso (TCC)
    • Ver item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A (in)constitucionalidade do inquérito nº4.781 do STF e a violação ao sistema processual acusatório.

    Thumbnail
    Visualizar/Abrir
    MARILENE.pdf (319.1Kb)
    Data
    2021
    Autor
    Cavalcante, Marilene do Nascimento
    Metadata
    Mostrar registro completo
    Resumo
    In the scope of the Federal Supreme Court, inquiry No. 4,781 was initiated, on March 14, 2019, by Minister Dias Toffoli, through Ordinance GP No. 69, invoking art. 43 of the RISTF, in order to investigate fraudulent news, slanderous denunciations, threats and infractions coated with animus calumniandi, diffamandi and injuriandi that affect the honorability and security of the Supreme Court, its members and their families. However, the ordinance does not mention the defendants; it does not indicate the time and place of the facts under investigation; the Public Ministry does not participate in the investigation; the Attorney General of the Republic opined for the filing of the records; the Minister Rapporteur rejected the filing request. The inquiry is an investigative procedure, in the face of news of the possible occurrence of a crime, the police initiates an investigation to obtain evidence that the crime actually happened, as well as gather evidence that indicates who the author was. The purpose of the inquiry is to provide evidence of the crime and its authorship so that the Public Ministry can prosecute the accused. The accusatory system adopted by the Federal Constitution of 1988 establishes a rigid separation between the prosecuting functions, it is up to the police to investigate, the Public Ministry to accuse and the Judiciary to judge. The establishment and continuation of investigation 4,781 of the STF, suffers strong legal and social criticism, as fundamental guarantees provided for in the Constitution are removed in order to punish those responsible for the conduct mentioned in the ordinance. The problem of the removal of the rights of the investigated that generates legal uncertainty, and mainly due to the inapplicability of the Federal Constitution, which must be supreme to all laws, including the Court responsible for its custody. Keywords: Federal Constitution. Fundamental Rights, Inquiry. Accusatory System. Federal Court of Justice
    URI
    http://repositorio.faculdadearidesa.edu.br/jspui/handle/hs826/134
    Collections
    • Trabalhos de Conclusão de Curso (TCC)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Entre em contato | Deixe sua opinião
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Navegar

    Todo o repositórioComunidades e ColeçõesPor data do documentoAutoresTítulosAssuntosEsta coleçãoPor data do documentoAutoresTítulosAssuntos

    Minha conta

    EntrarCadastro

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Entre em contato | Deixe sua opinião
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV